Islam:
Faith and History
Mahmoud M. Ayoub
2004Oneworld, Oxford
p. 8
Islam is an Arabic word meaning submission, or surrender. The three letter root,
s/l/m, from which the word islam is derived also means peace (salam), soundness,
and safety. Islam is therefore a person's total submission to the will of God,
which gives him or her inner pace and soundness of nature in this life and
safety from divine retribution in the life to come.
"Islam" is the name of the third and last of the monotheistic faiths
that arose in the Middle East, coming after Judaism and Christianity. The name
signifies the commitment of its adherents to live in total submission to God
within a prescribed conduct as difined by the Qur'an, the sunnah of the Prophet
Muhammad and the living tradition.
p. 18
It is quite probable that Muhammad belonged to the small circle of hanafs,
already mentioned. Certainly, tradition reports that Muhammad loathed his
people's idol worship and their immoral and foolish ways. Once a year, during
the hot summer month of Ramadan, Muhammad spent days in seclusion in a cave on
Mount Hira, a short distance from Makkah. It was during one of these retreats
that he received the call to prophethood and the first revelation of the Qur'an.
As Mujammad sat one night in the solitude of his retreat, a superhuman being,
later identified as Gabriel (Jibral in Arabic) appeared to him. Taking hold on
him and pressing him so hard that he could not breathe, the angel commanded:
"Recite [or,'read']!" Muhammad answered: "I cannot read."
After repeating the command a second a third time, the angel continued
.
p. 25
.In short, without Makkah Islam would be incomplete, without the rest of
Arabia it would remain powerless.
The Makkah, however, remained intransigent; they would not accept Islam. And so
the Prophet resorted to the familiar strategies of economic and military
pressure: Muslims intercepted and raided Makkah caravans on their way from
Syria. The Makkans were forced to defend their trade routes. In 2/624 they sent
out an army of about a thousand men which was met by a three-hundred man Muslim
detachment at the well of Badr. Poorly equipped and far outnumbered but highly
motivated, the Muslims inflicted a crushing defeat on the Makkans.
p. 26
Immediately following the defeat at Uhud the Prophet decided to expel the Jews
from Madanah and its neighboring settlements. The reason given was that the
Jews, by aiding the Makkans through economic alliance against the Muslim state,
had breached their covenant and forfeited their right to protection. The deeper
motive behind this drastic measure may have been, at least in part, to free the
Muslim sate of outside influences at this critical stage of its formative
history.
p.26-27
Two years later, in 8/630, Muhammad led a large army against Makkah, the Quraysh
having breached the truce by killing a man of the tribe of KhuzaŽah, which was
closely allied with the Muslims. There was, however, no fighting, no bloodshed,
no vengence. The Makkans capitulated and accepted Islam an masse; the Prophet
granted safe passage to all in the city. Clearly powerless after the Prophet's
victory over them, the Makkans asked him what he intended to do with them. He
answered, "I will do with you what Joseph did with his brothers. Go, you
are free."
Muhammad was primarily a prophet, not a conqueror. He did not wage this or any
battle for the sake of building an empire; rather he sought to establish a faith
and a faith-community. Whenever an individual or tribe accepted Islam, all
hostilities ceased and the enemy became brothers in faith. Muhammad regarded his
victory over Makkah not as his own but as God's victory.
p. 40
Revelation was given to the Prophet Muhammad over a period of twenty-two years.
Both the Qur'an and tradition assert that the angel Gabriel repeatedly appeared
to the Prophet, often in human guise, and transmitted the words that came to
constitute the verses and sarah ("chapters") of the Qur'an. During the
moment of revelation the Prophet would fall into a heightened state of
consciousness, the effects of which were visibly manifest in his physical
appearance and behavior. It is said that at times he sensed in his ears sounds
like the ringing of a bell. These sounds were then apprehended by him as direct
revelation from God, which he then conveyed to the people in human words.
p. 41
The first revelation to Muhammad, as we have seen, was a command to
"recite" or "read" (iqra'). The term qur'an is derived from
the same tri-lateral root, q/r/a, meaning "to read" or "to
recite." The Qur'an is therefore a sacred book mean to be recited or
chanted aloud, not silently perused or read. The "reading" of it
demands an oral recitation that imitates its actual revelation to Muhammad.
p. 44
The Qur'an urges Muslims to ponder its verses in order to discern its divine
authorship and inner unity (See Q. 4:82, 47:24, and 38:29). The community has
therefore dedicated some of its best minds to the task of understanding and
interpreting the Qur'an. The result has been a long and rich history of
exegetical literature which began in the second/eight century and continues to
the present.
p. 68
The goal of true jihad is to attain a perfect harmony between islam
(submission), iman (faith), and ihsan (righteous living).
p. 90
With the fall of Baghdad as a center of Islamic spiritual and material culture,
a new era of Muslim history began. Henceforth, it was not the state or the
military but traders, religious scholars, and Sufi masters who assumed the work
of preserving and spreading Islam as a faith and civilization throughout Asia
and Africa. These new domains produced their own religio-cultural centers. And
although the caliphate ceased to exist as a reality, it has remained the ideal
of Islamic rule; one that many Muslims still long to recover.
p. 91
Like Christianity, Islam is a universalist and therefore a missionary religion.
Muslims believe that their message of faith in the one God, his angels, and all
prophets and scriptures, and in the principles of divine reward and retribution
on the day of judgment is intended for all of humankind. Furthermore, they
believe that Islam, as a social, political, and economic system based on these
principles, can be fully implemented only in a sovereign community that
transcends the limitations of cultural and linguistic barriers and geographic
borders. The vast domain of this community has been legally designated as dar
al-islam, meaning the "house" or "abode of Islam." The rest
of the world is primarily divided into either the sphere of peace or truce (sulh),
or the sphere of war (harb), depending on the relationship of the Muslims to any
particular area of the world. Yet the whole world is regarded by Muslims as
potentially the house of Islam.
p. 96
Although the Muslims were stopped from advancing into France and the rest of
western Europe in 732 by Charles Martel in the Battle of Poitiers, and although
their armies were driven from the Iberian peninsula by the forces of Christian
Spain, their scientific and cultural achievements succeeded where their military
might failed. Arab learning did indeed penetrate deeply into western Europe and
contributed directly to the rise of the West to world prominence. Ironically,
the religious establishment, which had provided both the impetus and framework
for these intellectual achievements, ultimately repressed and repudiated them.
p. 96
The spread of Islam into West Africa took place in three stages. Initially, a
small Muslim community would begin to form under a non-muslim king. This would
be followed by the adoption of Islam as the court religion and then, as Islam
gained official recognition, its numbers were expanded through mass conversions.
Bt the eighteenth century Islam was a formidable social and political force in
Africa and could provide the framework and principles for social and political
reform. Islamic law also increasingly came to compete with traditional legal
custom.
p.120
Unlike later jurist-traditionalists, Malik gave equal weight to the Prophet's
sunnah and the "practice," or "living tradition" of the
people of Madanah. He also showed far greater reliance on the effort to deduce
well-considered legal opinions (ijhtihad) than did later distinguished religious
scholars. He was frequently guided in this effort by the principle of the
"common good," or "welfare" (maslahah) of the people.
Aba Hanafah before him also showed greater reliance on rational thinking and
living tradition. He resorted frequently to the two principles of analogical
reasoning (qayas) and rational preference (istishan).
A decisive stage in the development of the science of jurisprudence came with
the crucial work of Muhammad b. Idras al-ShafiŽa (d. 819).
He spent his
last years in Egypt where he wrote the first systematic treatise on Islamic
jurisprudence. His hitherto unsurpassed work radically changed the scope and
nature of this important discipline. ShafiŽa advocated absolute dependence on
the two primary sources of Islamic law, the Qur'an and sunnah. He thus based his
own system on a vast collection of hadaith and legal tradition entitled Kitab
al-umm; which he compiled for that purpose.
ShafiŽa restricted the use of qayas, or analogical reasoning, and rejected both
the Hanafa principle of istishan and the Malika principle of maslahah. In his
insistence on basing all juridical judgments on the Qur'an and sunnah he
preferred, in opposition to the majority of jurists of his time, a hadath
transmitted on a single authority over personal opinion. His argument was that
jurists should not rely on the opinions of men instead of the Book of God and
the sunnah of his Prophet.
p. 124
Islamic law as it was developed in the legal schools is based on four sources.
Two of these, the Qur'an and the sunnah of the Prophet and his generation, are
its material and primary sources. The other two are formal sources that
represent human endeavor and acceptance. They are the personal reasoning (ijtihad)
of the scholars and the general consensus (ijmaŽ) of the community.
Personal reasoning, the first of the two formal sources of jurisprudence, is the
process of deducing laws from the Qur'an and sunnah. These deduced laws became
the foundations for the legal schools and explain their diversity. The term
"ijtihad" signifies a scholar's best effort in executing this process
of deduction. It uses qayas, or analogical reasoning, as its instrument.
The process of analogical reasoning consists of four methodological steps. The
first is to find a text in the Qur'an or hadath pertinent to a new case or
problem facing the jurist. The second is to discern the similarities and
differences of the conditions surrounding the two cases. The third step is for
the jurist to allow for such differences in making his judgment. The final step
is to extend the rationale of the Qur'anic or hadath judgment to cover the new
case. Needless to say, the elaboration and application of these principles
presented many difficulties and differences of opinion among jurists.
While the methodology of personal reasoning may be considered a toll for
deriving Islamic law, the principle of consensus (ijmaŽ) is meant to be a
stabdard by which the continuity, authenticity, and truth of the three other
sources of law are ensured.
Consensus, moreover, has remained the final
arbiter of truth and error, expressed in the Prophet assertion "my
community will not agree on an error."
Yet even this important principle has been the subject of much debate and
dissension among the scholars of the various schools. One question that arose
was whether the consensus of earlier generations is binding on the present one.
Another was whether consensus refers to the agreement of the scholars of the
different schools or to the consensus of the Muslim community at large.
p. 126
By the fourth/tenth century, with the establishment of the major Sunni legal
schools and by a sort of undeclared common consensus, the "door of ijtihad"
was generally considered to be closed.
p. 128
the shaŽah of ŽAli represented the poorer and under-privileged elements of
Muslim society. It quickly attracted large numbers of non-Arab converts known as
mawala, who usually belonged to this underprivileged class. The mawala were
"clients" or "subordinate allies" of an Arab tribe or clan;
a position that gave them quasi-Arab identity and status, as well as protection.
The mawala were conquered people who, by and large, came from cultures superior
to that of their Arab conquerors. During Umayyad rule these people were second
class members of Arab-Muslim society
.
By the tenth century, Sunni Islam had developed a stable and genrally unform
legal and theological system. ShaŽa piety, which rests on an ethos of suffering
and martyrdom, and hence a revolutionary ideology, has in contrast been a
movement of change, instability, and wide diversity.
p. 163
MuŽtazila theology was from the beginning deeply rationalistic. It was
influenced by Greek rationalism as well as Christian theology, thus, in contrast
with Christian trinitarianism, MuŽtazila theologians argued that God's absolute
oneness necessitates that his attributes (sifat) be one with his essence (dhat).
Otherwise, there would be God and his word, God and his power, God and his
knowledge, and so on, which would imply a multiplicity of gods, and error worse
than the Christian doctrine of the trinity.
p. 165
The caliph al-Mutawakkil (r. 847-861) reversed this policy, re-affirmed Sunni
orthodoxy, and persecuted the MuŽtazilites. MuŽtazilism thus gradually lost
its vitality as a rationalist school of Islamic theology and not long thereafter
it died out. But its tenets of divine unity and justice have been preserved in
Zayda nad Twelver Imama ShiŽism.
p. 165
AshŽara rejected the MuŽtazila view of divine justice, arguing instead for
God's absolute freedom to will and act as he chooses, without being answerable
to any of his creatures. God is just because he wills to be just; were he to
will otherwise, his actions would still be right and good. Similarly, good and
evil are what they are, not in themselves, but because God decrees them to be
so. Nor are they determined by human reason, but again simply by God's
legislation. Good and evil are not rational or even moral in essence, but
legislative. Were God to stipulate in the sharaŽah that lying, adultery, and
theft were good, they would be allowed in spite of the fact that human reason
may judge them to be evil. God only allows human beings to discern good and
evil, not to legislate or determine them.
p. 167
The Qur'an itself is not a systematic theological treatise. It affirms, at one
and the same time, divine predestination and human free-will and responsibility.
There are, in fact, verses that can be used to support even extreme MuŽtazila
and AshŽara positions. Nonetheless, the Muslim community divided into two
theologically distinct camps, the Qadarites abd the Jabrites, which in their
extreme forms were placed outside the pale of Islamic orthodoxy. The former
either minimized or denied altogether divine decree (qadar), the latter affirmed
it absolutely as divine predeterminism (jabr). The first camp included ShiŽites,
MuŽtazilites, and philosophically inclined thinkers; the second comprised the
Sunni majority.
In the end, it was AshŽarism that triumphed. To this day, Sunni Friday prayer
leaders affirm belief in divine decree, be it good or evil, from mosque pulpits
around the world. They warn their faithful listeners: "Of all things, the
most evil are novel;ties, for evry novelty is an innovation, every innovation is
an error, and evry error leads to the Fire."
While Christinas considered theology to be "the queen of the
sciences," some Muslims, like al-Ghazala, considered it to be the work of
Satan. They argued that theology confused the generality of Muslims, discouraged
any kind of innovative thinking, and occupied intellectuals with unsolvable
questions.
The gate of theological creativity was, like the gate of ijtihad, virtually
closed in the Sunni community until the end of the nineteenth century. Then, in
his treatise entitled Risalat al-tawhad ("The Message of Divine
Oneness"), the Egyptian reformer Muhammad ŽAbduh (d. 1905) reviewed
traditional positions and judged them irrelevant. In the ShiŽa community,
however, both theology and philosophy have continued to flourish and have
occasional moments of originality.
p. 170-171
The two first major philosophers were Aba Yasuf YaŽqab al-Kinda (d. 870) and Aba
Bakr Zakaraya al-Raza (d. 926). Al-Kinda was a theologian-philosopher who, at
least intellectually, belonged to the MuŽtazila rationalist school. Using
philosophical principles and methods of reasoning, al-Kinda defended fundamental
Islamic beliefs, such as God's existence and oneness, the temporal creation of
the universe by God's command out of nothing, the necessity for prophets, and
the inimitability (iŽjaz) of the Qur'an. Unlike the philosopher, who acquires
his knowledge through rational investigation and contemplation, the prophet,
argued al-Kinda, receives his knowledge instantaneously, through divine
revelation.
In contrast, Raza was a thoroughgoing Platonist. He rejects the Qur'anic view of
creation out of nothing, presenting instead a view based on Plato's theory as
elaborated in the Timaeus. The universe evolved, according to Raza, from primal
matter floating as atoms in an absolute void. God imposed order on this primeval
chaos and thus the universe or cosmos came into being. Moreover, because it is
in the nature of matter to revert to its primeval state, at some distant point
in the future chaos will set in again.
In this scheme of creation, since neither the existence of the world nor
humankind has moral or religious basis or purpose, there is no need for prophets
or even religion. Human souls, which come down to the body from the celestial
realm of the universal soul, will all in the end despise this material body and
return to their original source. Salvation, or eternal happiness, can be
attained through wisdom and the contemplation of higher things, but in any case,
all will be saved in the end.
Raza was a humanistic philosopher for whom religion was the source of social
strife and conflict. He was therefore considered a heretic by both theologians
and moderate philosophers. For this reason, the works of this fascinating
thinker were lost and the little that is known about his thought is derived from
extensive quotations of his writings in the works of his detractors.
In spite of Raza's originality, it was al-Kinda's system of relating philosophy
to faith that was most influential.
p. 184
marriage to more than one wife is allowed by the Qur'an in order to deal with
the problem of female orphans and widows in a traditional society beset with
continuous warfare. In fact, the verses of Sarah Four that deal with the issue
of polygyny are reported to have been revealed shortly after the Battle of Uhud
in which numerous Muslim fighters fell, leaving many widows and orphans behind.
p. 199
the Wahhabas regarded all those who did not share their convictions to be
either misbelievers (kuffar) or persons gone astray. They thus waged a violent
campaign aimed at purging Muslim society of what they considered to be its
un-Islamic beliefs and practices. They tried to destroy the prophet's tomb in
Madanah and level the graves of his Companions. They attacked the ShiŽite
sacred cities of Najaf and Karbala', massacred their inhabitants, and destroyed
the shrines of ŽAla and his son Husayn. They also went on a rampage of Arab
cities, desecrating the tombs of Sufi saints and destroying their shrines.
p. 202
The Arab renaissance of the nineteenth century was largely stimulated by a
Western cultural and intellectual efflorescence. With the breakup of traditional
church-dominated regimes and institutions as a consequence of the protestant
Reformation and the Enlightenment, secularism and romantic nationalism largely
supplanted religious faith and institutions in nineteenth-century Europe. These
ideas appealed to secular Christians and Muslim Arabs alike and in the end led
to the rise of Arab nationalism.
p. 203
Afghana introduced a new approach to the West that continues to be upheld, in
one way or another, by reformers to the present. He admired the vigor, industry,
and seriousness of Europeans, but argued that these were in fact Islamic values
that Muslims had lost and had to recover. Science, he argued, is not the
exclusive property of the West, but a universal field of knowledge open to all
people, regardless of religion and cultural identity.
Islam, for Afghana and his followers is a rational religion that is in full
accord with science. In contrast, Christianity is irrational, Afghana asserted,
as it is based on mysteries that people are enjoined to believe without
understanding. Therefore, when Europe was most Christian it was most backward,
while the Muslim community was most advanced when it was most Muslim.
p. 204
While sharing Afghana's view of the superiority of Islamic faith and
civilization over Christianity and Western civilization, ŽAbduh was a pragmatic
reformer. He was convinced that for the reform to be effective, it had to begin
within.